Tagged: wikileaks.

Well now I’ve finally got it. Julian Assange was brought up in an Aryan supremacist cult — the snow-white hair is no accident! The cult (“The Family”) was set up by a theosophist along the lines of the Nazi “Lebensborn” breeding program; and the Pirate Bay also has Nazi connections. Anna Ardin is a double agent. Join the dots and you end up in Illuminati territory; Assange DOES equal Saddam, or Satan, as American TV has been saying all along!

I have spent a good couple of hours trying to make sense of the logic and theories here, since these and similar ones have done the rounds of crackpot conspiracy sites and forums, and appear to be believed by many.

Well … at least this line of inquiry from Assange to Illuminati balances, or maybe neutralises, the other theory doing the rounds — among 911 “truthers” and some pro-Palestinian groups — that WikiLeaks is an Israeli PsyOps project.

Mainstream Australian papers — which have no interest in defending or protecting Assange — have mentioned two facts that the conspiracists ran with. Julian’s stepfather was thought to have had a relative who was in The Family, and his parents broke up acrimoniously three years after they married.

Maybe mum Christine will say more at some stage but really we don’t know. All *I* know is that Julian is extraordinarily intelligent and well read. The pseudo-scholars and academics with PhDs and crackpot websites and radio shows can safely be disregarded.

As can Fox News, which also spreads the idea that he’s disturbed and deranged. Here’s “Dr Keith Ablow” of Fox’s “Medical A-Team”: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/12/14/dr-keith-ablow-inside-mind-julian-assange/

05:38 am, by kg13 4  |  Comments

A few recent takes on the WikiLeaks phenomenon


"Assange’s lawyer is a high profile establishment lawyer whose law firm works for the Rothschilds. It seems to me that this is proof enough that Assange is a Rothschild puppet and that Wikileaks is a Rothschild operation."
— just a taste of the wacky stuff on “The Truth Seeker”.

A lot of people are peddling a lot of shit on WL; this conspiracy stuff is only one aspect. Israel Shamir, eg, has been described both as virulently anti-Semitic and on the payroll of (a supposedly Mossad-run) WikiLeaks. How would you square that?

More seriously … it seems like no document release, no matter how big and damning, can lead to the end of an American occupation or the collapse of a US administraion now cos govt, aided by much of US media, keeps the focus on the leaks themselves rather than the info obtained. That is cause to be very worried.


If you read one US commentator on this whole subject, make it Glenn Greenwald. He is always on top of it, extremely astute and keeps track of a lot of other pundits and commentaries.
Greenwald: “Whatever else is true, the DOJ seems intent on pressuring Manning to incriminate Assange. It would be bizarre indeed to make a deal with the leaking government employee in order to incriminate the non-government-employee who merely publi…shed the classified information. But that may very well at least partially explain (though obviously not remotely justify) why the Government is holding Manning under such repressive conditions: in order to “induce” him to say what they need him to say in order to indict WikiLeaks and Assange.”


And spare more than a thought for Bradley Manning. He has been living in the barbaric conditions of solitary confinement, cut off from everything, for seven months w/o charge.


Naomi Wolf points out that the Swedes’ great interest in bringing Assange to justice for “sex crimes” is completely inconsistent with their record on bringing rape and sex cases, which has been criticised as generally slack, even negligent. So either Assange was REALLY bad, bad enough for them to act, or there was a hidden agenda. No-brainer, of course.

Also, I haven’t seen any discussion among the Americans speculating (some enthusiastically) on what could be done with Assange  that mentions the cryptographer aspect of his work. eg, the New Yorker article on him in May said Assange spent three months working to crack the encryption on the Apache shootings video. Wouldn’t that also be seen as a break-in of sorts? It certainly required determined effort to see something that had been strongly shielded from the public.

I just hope that in the coming months all media outlets drawing stories from the cables themselves back Manning and Assange in a real and practical way, cos the WikiLeaks releases have been, and will continue to be, a gold mine for them.

04:17 pm, by kg13  Comments

Poster for the attention of Oz PM Gillard, published in The Australian (national newspaper) today. This is work of the GetUp! pressure group, which has massive support from the public to run a campaign on behalf of WikiLeaks and Assange.

Best viewed BIG though:

flickr.com/photos/judefa/5262113965/sizes/o/ [flickr.com]

pls feel free to reblog or use the Flickr image, but make sure you point to GetUp:


  03:16 pm, by kg13 3  |  Comments

A round-up of good recent reads


This is an absolute ripper about an Australian reporter’s journey to Britain in pursuit of Assange and leaked cables. News-gathering and espionage intersect here.


Analysis of the Wikileaks fall-out from an Australian and law/rights perspective. Academic Scott Burchill says Assange better get himself back here to be bodily as safe as possible - but we have the obstacle of a government that (so far) won’t support him. The PM answers to Joe Lieberman.


An examination of how the Australian PM stands on this issue. There is unprecedented and very vocal support for Assange from the people so some pundits are predicting this could be Gillard’s undoing. Incidentally, among the fascinating disclosures from wiki cables this week has been the information that the US had been grooming her for a couple of years before she became PM - in a coup rather than by election - in June. She (or her party) didn’t win the federal election that followed either, but scraped a minority government together after sealing deals with independents.


Brief interview with Julian’s laid-back, bohemian mother. She comes across as very different from J except that they share a fierce, uncompromising I would say, independent spirit. So there’s inspiration here!


In depth portrait of a highly unusual person - filling in some of the gaps in popular knowledge about Mr Assange. “He’s a very minimalist human being. He’s like a religious aesthete, two robes and a pair of sandals. Aesthetes live a very sombre existence in terms of material goods and that’s what he’s like.”

~ ~ ~

See my StumbleUpon or Facebook page for more - lack of time; I am only doing the occasional update in Tumblr

  07:35 am, by kg13 4  |  Comments

Please read the article by Julian Assange which I clipped this from. It is important to everyone who uses the net

  12:09 pm, by kg13 18  |  Comments

Julian Assange’s mission for total transparency - from them this time, not us

The article (published in June) is a tour de force. Eighteen pages printed out, but I coudn’t put it down. Below are a few cuts from it.

Amplify’d from www.newyorker.com
Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, oversees a populist intelligence network. Digitally altered photograph by Phillip Toledano.

Assange typically tells would-be litigants to go to hell. In 2008, WikiLeaks posted secret Scientology manuals, and lawyers representing the church demanded that they be removed. Assange’s response was to publish more of the Scientologists’ internal material, and to announce, “WikiLeaks will not comply with legally abusive requests from Scientology any more than WikiLeaks has complied with similar demands from Swiss banks, Russian offshore stem-cell centers, former African kleptocrats, or the Pentagon.”

At around six in the evening, Assange got up from his spot at the table. He was holding a hard drive containing Project B. The video—excerpts of running footage captured by a camera mounted on the Apache—depicts soldiers conducting an operation in eastern Baghdad, not long after the surge began. Using the Freedom of Information Act, Reuters has sought for three years to obtain the video from the Army, without success. Assange would not identify his source, saying only that the person was unhappy about the attack. The video was digitally encrypted, and it took WikiLeaks three months to crack. Assange, a cryptographer of exceptional skill, told me that unlocking the file was “moderately difficult.”

The first phase was chilling, in part because the banter of the soldiers was so far beyond the boundaries of civilian discourse. “Just fuckin’, once you get on ’em, just open ’em up,” one of them said. The crew members of the Apache came upon about a dozen men ambling down a street, a block or so from American troops, and reported that five or six of the men were armed with AK-47s; as the Apache maneuvered into position to fire at them, the crew saw one of the Reuters journalists, who were mixed in among the other men, and mistook a long-lensed camera for an RPG. The Apaches fired on the men for twenty-five seconds, killing nearly all of them instantly.

Assange was the sole decision-maker, and it was possible to leave the house at night and come back after sunrise and see him in the same place, working. (“I spent two months in one room in Paris once without leaving,” he said. “People were handing me food.”) He spoke to the team in shorthand—“I need the conversion stuff,” or “Make sure that credit-card donations are acceptable”—all the while resolving flareups with the overworked volunteers. To keep track of who was doing what, Gonggrijp and another activist maintained a workflow chart with yellow Post-Its on the kitchen cabinets. Elsewhere, people were translating the video’s subtitles into various languages, or making sure that servers wouldn’t crash from the traffic that was expected after the video was posted. Assange wanted the families of the Iraqis who had died in the attack to be contacted, to prepare them for the inevitable media attention, and to gather additional information. In conjunction with Iceland’s national broadcasting service, RUV, he sent two Icelandic journalists to Baghdad to find them.

Assange was born in 1971, in the city of Townsville, on Australia’s northeastern coast, but it is probably more accurate to say that he was born into a blur of domestic locomotion. Shortly after his first birthday, his mother—I will call her Claire—married a theatre director, and the two collaborated on small productions. They moved often, living near Byron Bay, a beachfront community in New South Wales, and on Magnetic Island, a tiny pile of rock that Captain Cook believed had magnetic properties that distorted his compass readings. They were tough-minded nonconformists. (At seventeen, Claire had burned her schoolbooks and left home on a motorcycle.) Their house on Magnetic Island burned to the ground, and rifle cartridges that Claire had kept for shooting snakes exploded like fireworks. “Most of this period of my childhood was pretty Tom Sawyer,” Assange told me. “I had my own horse. I built my own raft. I went fishing. I was going down mine shafts and tunnels.”

Assange’s mother believed that formal education would inculcate an unhealthy respect for authority in her children and dampen their will to learn. “I didn’t want their spirits broken,” she told me. In any event, the family had moved thirty-seven times by the time Assange was fourteen, making consistent education impossible. He was homeschooled, sometimes, and he took correspondence classes and studied informally with university professors. But mostly he read on his own, voraciously. He was drawn to science. “I spent a lot of time in libraries going from one thing to another, looking closely at the books I found in citations, and followed that trail,” he recalled. He absorbed a large vocabulary, but only later did he learn how to pronounce all the words that he learned.

When Assange turned sixteen, he got a modem, and his computer was transformed into a portal. Web sites did not exist yet—this was 1987—but computer networks and telecom systems were sufficiently linked to form a hidden electronic landscape that teen-agers with the requisite technical savvy could traverse. Assange called himself Mendax—from Horace’s splendide mendax, or “nobly untruthful”—and he established a reputation as a sophisticated programmer who could break into the most secure networks. He joined with two hackers to form a group that became known as the International Subversives, and they broke into computer systems in Europe and North America, including networks belonging to the U.S. Department of Defense and to the Los Alamos National Laboratory. In a book called “Underground,” which he collaborated on with a writer named Suelette Dreyfus, he outlined the hacker subculture’s early Golden Rules: “Don’t damage computer systems you break into (including crashing them); don’t change the information in those systems (except for altering logs to cover your tracks); and share information.”

In September, 1991, when Assange was twenty, he hacked into the master terminal that Nortel, the Canadian telecom company, maintained in Melbourne, and began to poke around. The International Subversives had been visiting the master terminal frequently. Normally, Assange hacked into computer systems at night, when they were semi-dormant, but this time a Nortel administrator was signed on. Sensing that he might be caught, Assange approached him with humor. “I have taken control,” he wrote, without giving his name. “For years, I have been struggling in this grayness. But now I have finally seen the light.” The administrator did not reply, and Assange sent another message: “It’s been nice playing with your system. We didn’t do any damage and we even improved a few things. Please don’t call the Australian Federal Police.”

Assange was charged with thirty-one counts of hacking and related crimes. While awaiting trial, he fell into a depression, and briefly checked himself into a hospital. He tried to stay with his mother, but after a few days he took to sleeping in nearby parks. He lived and hiked among dense eucalyptus forests in the Dandenong Ranges National Park, which were thick with mosquitoes whose bites scarred his face. “Your inner voice quiets down,” he told me. “Internal dialogue is stimulated by a preparatory desire to speak, but it is not actually useful if there are no other people around.” He added, “I don’t want to sound too Buddhist. But your vision of yourself disappears.”

Assange, facing a potential sentence of ten years in prison, found the state’s reaction confounding. He bought Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s “The First Circle,” a novel about scientists and technicians forced into the Gulag, and read it three times. (“How close the parallels to my own adventures!” he later wrote.) He was convinced that “look/see” hacking was a victimless crime, and intended to fight the charges. But the other members of the group decided to coöperate. “When a judge says, ‘The prisoner shall now rise,’ and no one else in the room stands—that is a test of character,” he told me. Ultimately, he pleaded guilty to twenty-five charges and six were dropped. But at his final sentencing the judge said, “There is just no evidence that there was anything other than sort of intelligent inquisitiveness and the pleasure of being able to—what’s the expression—surf through these various computers.” Assange’s only penalty was to pay the Australian state a small sum in damages.

Assange was burned out. He motorcycled across Vietnam. He held various jobs, and even earned money as a computer-security consultant, supporting his son to the extent that he was able. He studied physics at the University of Melbourne. He thought that trying to decrypt the secret laws governing the universe would provide the intellectual stimulation and rush of hacking. It did not. In 2006, on a blog he had started, he wrote about a conference organized by the Australian Institute of Physics, “with 900 career physicists, the body of which were sniveling fearful conformists of woefully, woefully inferior character.”

Read more at www.newyorker.com
05:29 am, by kg13 6  |  Comments