The US tried to persuade Australia to take in one of Saddam’s chemical warfare experts but was declined. Not to worry though - the US gave him a job.
Another sensational piece of information we were never meant to have, courtesy of WikiLeaks.
Well now I’ve finally got it. Julian Assange was brought up in an Aryan supremacist cult — the snow-white hair is no accident! The cult (“The Family”) was set up by a theosophist along the lines of the Nazi “Lebensborn” breeding program; and the Pirate Bay also has Nazi connections. Anna Ardin is a double agent. Join the dots and you end up in Illuminati territory; Assange DOES equal Saddam, or Satan, as American TV has been saying all along!

I have spent a good couple of hours trying to make sense of the logic and theories here, since these and similar ones have done the rounds of crackpot conspiracy sites and forums, and appear to be believed by many.
Well … at least this line of inquiry from Assange to Illuminati balances, or maybe neutralises, the other theory doing the rounds — among 911 “truthers” and some pro-Palestinian groups — that WikiLeaks is an Israeli PsyOps project.
Mainstream Australian papers — which have no interest in defending or protecting Assange — have mentioned two facts that the conspiracists ran with. Julian’s stepfather was thought to have had a relative who was in The Family, and his parents broke up acrimoniously three years after they married.
Maybe mum Christine will say more at some stage but really we don’t know. All *I* know is that Julian is extraordinarily intelligent and well read. The pseudo-scholars and academics with PhDs and crackpot websites and radio shows can safely be disregarded.
As can Fox News, which also spreads the idea that he’s disturbed and deranged. Here’s “Dr Keith Ablow” of Fox’s “Medical A-Team”: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/12/14/dr-keith-ablow-inside-mind-julian-assange/
The US tried to persuade Australia to take in one of Saddam’s chemical warfare experts but was declined. Not to worry though - the US gave him a job.
Another sensational piece of information we were never meant to have, courtesy of WikiLeaks.
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=16166
“Assange’s lawyer is a high profile establishment lawyer whose law firm works for the Rothschilds. It seems to me that this is proof enough that Assange is a Rothschild puppet and that Wikileaks is a Rothschild operation.”
— just a taste of the wacky stuff on “The Truth Seeker”.
A lot of people are peddling a lot of shit on WL; this conspiracy stuff is only one aspect. Israel Shamir, eg, has been described both as virulently anti-Semitic and on the payroll of (a supposedly Mossad-run) WikiLeaks. How would you square that?
More seriously … it seems like no document release, no matter how big and damning, can lead to the end of an American occupation or the collapse of a US administraion now cos govt, aided by much of US media, keeps the focus on the leaks themselves rather than the info obtained. That is cause to be very worried.
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/12/16/wikileaks
If you read one US commentator on this whole subject, make it Glenn Greenwald. He is always on top of it, extremely astute and keeps track of a lot of other pundits and commentaries.
Greenwald: “Whatever else is true, the DOJ seems intent on pressuring Manning to incriminate Assange. It would be bizarre indeed to make a deal with the leaking government employee in order to incriminate the non-government-employee who merely publi…shed the classified information. But that may very well at least partially explain (though obviously not remotely justify) why the Government is holding Manning under such repressive conditions: in order to “induce” him to say what they need him to say in order to indict WikiLeaks and Assange.”
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/backissues/2010/12/in-solitary.html
And spare more than a thought for Bradley Manning. He has been living in the barbaric conditions of solitary confinement, cut off from everything, for seven months w/o charge.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/post_1435_b_797188.html
Naomi Wolf points out that the Swedes’ great interest in bringing Assange to justice for “sex crimes” is completely inconsistent with their record on bringing rape and sex cases, which has been criticised as generally slack, even negligent. So either Assange was REALLY bad, bad enough for them to act, or there was a hidden agenda. No-brainer, of course.
Also, I haven’t seen any discussion among the Americans speculating (some enthusiastically) on what could be done with Assange that mentions the cryptographer aspect of his work. eg, the New Yorker article on him in May said Assange spent three months working to crack the encryption on the Apache shootings video. Wouldn’t that also be seen as a break-in of sorts? It certainly required determined effort to see something that had been strongly shielded from the public.
I just hope that in the coming months all media outlets drawing stories from the cables themselves back Manning and Assange in a real and practical way, cos the WikiLeaks releases have been, and will continue to be, a gold mine for them.
Poster for the attention of Oz PM Gillard, published in The Australian (national newspaper) today. This is work of the GetUp! pressure group, which has massive support from the public to run a campaign on behalf of WikiLeaks and Assange.
Best viewed BIG though:
flickr.com/photos/judefa/5262113965/sizes/o/ [flickr.com]
pls feel free to reblog or use the Flickr image, but make sure you point to GetUp:
This is a Swedish doco in English featuring interviews with Assange and activists and adversaries, the Collateral Murder video and Bradley Manning’s chat log, and grapples with the massive implications of WikiLeaks’ success.
It’s also on YouTube, but broken into four parts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhTfOL9_HBE
Some notes on watching the doco (these supplied by a friend):
Scientology tried to censor him. Leaks.org registered in 1999.
Information is the most cost-effective political weapon, large scale reform based on information.
In 2006 Assange hoped for people to write but it did not happen.
German KAOS computer club of hackers supporters. NOT Spectators but active communicators.
Sweden good record in protecting publications. PRQ customers Stockholm total secrecy. Protected by Swedish laws. VPN tunnels. They don’t disclose IP numbers. Hardest ISP in the world.
Published military manuals on how to break down detainees. Published Sarah Palin emails. Release lists of censored websites, their sites were then shut down in Thailand China and Iran.
Support from Iceland because of banking corruption exposed.
Bradley Manning US intelligence analyst in Iraq had access to database forwarded to wikileaks to “the crazy white haired dude” Biggest leak ever, Manning charged.
“Collateral Murder Film” Video of American helicopter crew in Afghan killing Reuters reporters. Hollow 30 mm bullets. Father stops in a minivan to help injured man also attacked with children in the car. The children survived. They Killed wounded crawling man Reuters reporter.
They brag about how many they killed.
Assange says end justifys the means. Stories of grief, cannot see it and not be affected by it. Escalation of force is a killing, the language used is hard cold inhuman. Logs show WAR IS HELL in raw detail. 109,000 lives lost detailed in these reports, the “lack of respect for human life runs like a thread through the material”. The US administration wants to censor this, disgusting.
The stronger the attack on wikileaks the greater the support for wikileaks.
At first welcomed in Sweden until rape allegations were made against him.
Openleaks new break away group of former wikileaks staff.
A moving report - you cannot watch it and still support USA moves to censor this material.
Guy Rundle finds more questions than answers in the frankly weird sex charges against the WikiLeaks boss. I personally still don’t get (a) why women - and these two had plainly been in awe of Assange - would go to the cops over something best kept private and (b) why the fucking self-righteousness, when they had obviously wanted to bed the guy.
Why get cops to demand a STD examination from Assange? If they were concerned why didn’t they just go to their doctors?
This is an engaging profile of Julian Assange, a highly intelligent aesthete who learnt mostly by reading and had little formal education. Article is by Suelette Dreyfus, who wrote a book about hacking, with input and collaboration from JA.
“Once, when Assange was packing boxes to move house, he complained at how long it took. Most people just throw things in boxes and tape them up. Not Assange.
“He approached putting his books in boxes as though he was solving a puzzle aimed at using all the space in the box most efficiently. If there was dead space in the box, the packing had not been optimal and was a failure. He would empty the box and restart the packing again.”
A round-up of good recent reads
This is an absolute ripper about an Australian reporter’s journey to Britain in pursuit of Assange and leaked cables. News-gathering and espionage intersect here.
Analysis of the Wikileaks fall-out from an Australian and law/rights perspective. Academic Scott Burchill says Assange better get himself back here to be bodily as safe as possible - but we have the obstacle of a government that (so far) won’t support him. The PM answers to Joe Lieberman.
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/pm-tanks-at-home-20101210-18srp.html
An examination of how the Australian PM stands on this issue. There is unprecedented and very vocal support for Assange from the people so some pundits are predicting this could be Gillard’s undoing. Incidentally, among the fascinating disclosures from wiki cables this week has been the information that the US had been grooming her for a couple of years before she became PM - in a coup rather than by election - in June. She (or her party) didn’t win the federal election that followed either, but scraped a minority government together after sealing deals with independents.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxCK1uUbxaY&feature=player_embedded
Brief interview with Julian’s laid-back, bohemian mother. She comes across as very different from J except that they share a fierce, uncompromising I would say, independent spirit. So there’s inspiration here!
In depth portrait of a highly unusual person - filling in some of the gaps in popular knowledge about Mr Assange. “He’s a very minimalist human being. He’s like a religious aesthete, two robes and a pair of sandals. Aesthetes live a very sombre existence in terms of material goods and that’s what he’s like.”
~ ~ ~
See my StumbleUpon or Facebook page for more - lack of time; I am only doing the occasional update in Tumblr
Read this, kids, and marvel at what it is that has been opened up with the WikiLeaks release of America’s secret files. There has never in history been a leak like this.
The cables themselves come via the huge Secret Internet Protocol Router Network, or SIPRNet. SIPRNet is the worldwide US military internet system, kept separate from the ordinary civilian internet and run by the Department of Defense in Washington. Since the attacks of September 2001, there has been a move in the US to link up archives of government information, in the hope that key intelligence no longer gets trapped in information silos or “stovepipes”.
An increasing number of US embassies have become linked to SIPRNet over the past decade, so that military and diplomatic information can be shared. By 2002, 125 embassies were on SIPRNet: by 2005, the number had risen to 180, and by now the vast majority of US missions worldwide are linked to the system - which is why the bulk of these cables are from 2008 and 2009.
An embassy dispatch marked SIPDIS is automatically downloaded on to its embassy classified website. From there, it can be accessed not only by anyone in the state department, but also by anyone in the US military who has a security clearance up to the ‘Secret’ level, a password, and a computer connected to SIPRNet - which astonishingly covers over 3m people.
There are several layers of data in here - ranging up to the “SECRET NOFORN” level, which means that they are designed never be shown to non-US citizens. Instead, they are supposed to be read by officials in Washington up to the level of current Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The cables are normally drafted by the local ambassador or subordinates. The “Top Secret” and above foreign intelligence documents cannot be accessed from SIPRNet.
Some people are asking - fairly - why so many people are prepared to dismiss sex allegations against Julian Assange w/o knowing the details. The answer lies in the women’s police statements, which were obtained by the UK Mail On Sunday at the time (late August).
Sweden, as we’re now well aware, does things differently. Apparently those statements are also available to the media in Sweden - and hence were studied and discussed exhaustively by WikiLeaks watchers, beginning in late August.
Please read the article by Julian Assange which I clipped this from. It is important to everyone who uses the net
theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/wikileaks/dont-shoot-messenger-for-revealing-… [theaustralian.com.au]
This is a powerful piece of writing by Julian Assange for The Australian today. He places his document-publishing project in the context of his Australian background, an appeal to reason and examples from newspaper history.
bbc.co.uk/news/business-11938320 [bbc.co.uk]
Assange now appears to have displaced Osama Bin Laden as the gravest human threat to America. Well done, Julian. Millions are with you. The US can and will go its totalitarian way, with corps and officials round the world in lockstep, but w/o the will of the people - so for how long?
spiegel.de/international/world/0 [spiegel.de] ,1518,733154,00.html
I will defriend and block anyone who persists in slurring him for the wrong reasons. At least the conservatives are not delusional: his actions do mock their authority and they are right to feel threatened.
But the conspiracy wingnuts completely miss the point of what WikiLeaks does. They have made assumptions from a pattern of clues w/o establishing the whole path. Sometimes they are wildly wrong, but they are always confident.
Assange is deeply respected because he deals only in facts, and only with documents passed to WL, which are rigorously verified before release. He does not solicit and is motivated only by the value he places on transparency.
“Truthers” need to think about it and start reading more reliable sources. The pretext of these slurs against Assange regarding 9/11, eg, is ludicrous. The likes of Gordon Duff and Alex Jones over-reacted to a perfectly legitimate criticism of them by the very honest Assange.
By honest I also mean intellectually honest.
They could learn a lot from him and WikiLeaks about assessing information. Those who work and volunteer for WL look at hard evidence and only at material submitted to them. That is why WL has a credibility that screaming cult leaders and some niche writers can only envy.
I too have a multitude of questions about 9/11 but I don’t expect Assange to conjure the answers out of thin air.
wlcentral.org/node/540 [wlcentral.org]
This protest was organised before Assange was arrested today. It is in conjunction with Intn’l Human Rights Day, which coudn’t be more appropriate. Our PM and politicians, toadying for the US, have threatened Assange with confiscation of his passport should he try and return here and actively looking for ways to charge him with a crime.
The article (published in June) is a tour de force. Eighteen pages printed out, but I coudn’t put it down. Below are a few cuts from it.
Assange typically tells would-be litigants to go to hell. In 2008, WikiLeaks posted secret Scientology manuals, and lawyers representing the church demanded that they be removed. Assange’s response was to publish more of the Scientologists’ internal material, and to announce, “WikiLeaks will not comply with legally abusive requests from Scientology any more than WikiLeaks has complied with similar demands from Swiss banks, Russian offshore stem-cell centers, former African kleptocrats, or the Pentagon.”
At around six in the evening, Assange got up from his spot at the table. He was holding a hard drive containing Project B. The video—excerpts of running footage captured by a camera mounted on the Apache—depicts soldiers conducting an operation in eastern Baghdad, not long after the surge began. Using the Freedom of Information Act, Reuters has sought for three years to obtain the video from the Army, without success. Assange would not identify his source, saying only that the person was unhappy about the attack. The video was digitally encrypted, and it took WikiLeaks three months to crack. Assange, a cryptographer of exceptional skill, told me that unlocking the file was “moderately difficult.”
The first phase was chilling, in part because the banter of the soldiers was so far beyond the boundaries of civilian discourse. “Just fuckin’, once you get on ’em, just open ’em up,” one of them said. The crew members of the Apache came upon about a dozen men ambling down a street, a block or so from American troops, and reported that five or six of the men were armed with AK-47s; as the Apache maneuvered into position to fire at them, the crew saw one of the Reuters journalists, who were mixed in among the other men, and mistook a long-lensed camera for an RPG. The Apaches fired on the men for twenty-five seconds, killing nearly all of them instantly.
Assange was the sole decision-maker, and it was possible to leave the house at night and come back after sunrise and see him in the same place, working. (“I spent two months in one room in Paris once without leaving,” he said. “People were handing me food.”) He spoke to the team in shorthand—“I need the conversion stuff,” or “Make sure that credit-card donations are acceptable”—all the while resolving flareups with the overworked volunteers. To keep track of who was doing what, Gonggrijp and another activist maintained a workflow chart with yellow Post-Its on the kitchen cabinets. Elsewhere, people were translating the video’s subtitles into various languages, or making sure that servers wouldn’t crash from the traffic that was expected after the video was posted. Assange wanted the families of the Iraqis who had died in the attack to be contacted, to prepare them for the inevitable media attention, and to gather additional information. In conjunction with Iceland’s national broadcasting service, RUV, he sent two Icelandic journalists to Baghdad to find them.
Assange was born in 1971, in the city of Townsville, on Australia’s northeastern coast, but it is probably more accurate to say that he was born into a blur of domestic locomotion. Shortly after his first birthday, his mother—I will call her Claire—married a theatre director, and the two collaborated on small productions. They moved often, living near Byron Bay, a beachfront community in New South Wales, and on Magnetic Island, a tiny pile of rock that Captain Cook believed had magnetic properties that distorted his compass readings. They were tough-minded nonconformists. (At seventeen, Claire had burned her schoolbooks and left home on a motorcycle.) Their house on Magnetic Island burned to the ground, and rifle cartridges that Claire had kept for shooting snakes exploded like fireworks. “Most of this period of my childhood was pretty Tom Sawyer,” Assange told me. “I had my own horse. I built my own raft. I went fishing. I was going down mine shafts and tunnels.”
Assange’s mother believed that formal education would inculcate an unhealthy respect for authority in her children and dampen their will to learn. “I didn’t want their spirits broken,” she told me. In any event, the family had moved thirty-seven times by the time Assange was fourteen, making consistent education impossible. He was homeschooled, sometimes, and he took correspondence classes and studied informally with university professors. But mostly he read on his own, voraciously. He was drawn to science. “I spent a lot of time in libraries going from one thing to another, looking closely at the books I found in citations, and followed that trail,” he recalled. He absorbed a large vocabulary, but only later did he learn how to pronounce all the words that he learned.
When Assange turned sixteen, he got a modem, and his computer was transformed into a portal. Web sites did not exist yet—this was 1987—but computer networks and telecom systems were sufficiently linked to form a hidden electronic landscape that teen-agers with the requisite technical savvy could traverse. Assange called himself Mendax—from Horace’s splendide mendax, or “nobly untruthful”—and he established a reputation as a sophisticated programmer who could break into the most secure networks. He joined with two hackers to form a group that became known as the International Subversives, and they broke into computer systems in Europe and North America, including networks belonging to the U.S. Department of Defense and to the Los Alamos National Laboratory. In a book called “Underground,” which he collaborated on with a writer named Suelette Dreyfus, he outlined the hacker subculture’s early Golden Rules: “Don’t damage computer systems you break into (including crashing them); don’t change the information in those systems (except for altering logs to cover your tracks); and share information.”
In September, 1991, when Assange was twenty, he hacked into the master terminal that Nortel, the Canadian telecom company, maintained in Melbourne, and began to poke around. The International Subversives had been visiting the master terminal frequently. Normally, Assange hacked into computer systems at night, when they were semi-dormant, but this time a Nortel administrator was signed on. Sensing that he might be caught, Assange approached him with humor. “I have taken control,” he wrote, without giving his name. “For years, I have been struggling in this grayness. But now I have finally seen the light.” The administrator did not reply, and Assange sent another message: “It’s been nice playing with your system. We didn’t do any damage and we even improved a few things. Please don’t call the Australian Federal Police.”
Assange was charged with thirty-one counts of hacking and related crimes. While awaiting trial, he fell into a depression, and briefly checked himself into a hospital. He tried to stay with his mother, but after a few days he took to sleeping in nearby parks. He lived and hiked among dense eucalyptus forests in the Dandenong Ranges National Park, which were thick with mosquitoes whose bites scarred his face. “Your inner voice quiets down,” he told me. “Internal dialogue is stimulated by a preparatory desire to speak, but it is not actually useful if there are no other people around.” He added, “I don’t want to sound too Buddhist. But your vision of yourself disappears.”
Assange, facing a potential sentence of ten years in prison, found the state’s reaction confounding. He bought Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s “The First Circle,” a novel about scientists and technicians forced into the Gulag, and read it three times. (“How close the parallels to my own adventures!” he later wrote.) He was convinced that “look/see” hacking was a victimless crime, and intended to fight the charges. But the other members of the group decided to coöperate. “When a judge says, ‘The prisoner shall now rise,’ and no one else in the room stands—that is a test of character,” he told me. Ultimately, he pleaded guilty to twenty-five charges and six were dropped. But at his final sentencing the judge said, “There is just no evidence that there was anything other than sort of intelligent inquisitiveness and the pleasure of being able to—what’s the expression—surf through these various computers.” Assange’s only penalty was to pay the Australian state a small sum in damages.
Read more at www.newyorker.comAssange was burned out. He motorcycled across Vietnam. He held various jobs, and even earned money as a computer-security consultant, supporting his son to the extent that he was able. He studied physics at the University of Melbourne. He thought that trying to decrypt the secret laws governing the universe would provide the intellectual stimulation and rush of hacking. It did not. In 2006, on a blog he had started, he wrote about a conference organized by the Australian Institute of Physics, “with 900 career physicists, the body of which were sniveling fearful conformists of woefully, woefully inferior character.”
know your cow butts
it used to be that one could select a good dairy cow based upon the shape of the hairs on its thighs. nowadays: growth hormones.
__