The US tried to persuade Australia to take in one of Saddam’s chemical warfare experts but was declined. Not to worry though - the US gave him a job.
Another sensational piece of information we were never meant to have, courtesy of WikiLeaks.
The US tried to persuade Australia to take in one of Saddam’s chemical warfare experts but was declined. Not to worry though - the US gave him a job.
Another sensational piece of information we were never meant to have, courtesy of WikiLeaks.
A comprehensive study of solitary confinement - how it affects prisoners and, towards the end, why it is used a lot in the US punishment system (including Gitmo).
Skim the first section about experiments with rhesus monkeys; that is actually the least interesting part.
The article includes powerful quotes from hostages such as Terry Anderson (journo held by Hezbollah), direct accounts of prisoners in the US system and psychiatrists’ views.
He was stiff from lying in bed day and night, yet tired all the time. He dozed off and on constantly, sleeping twelve hours a day. He craved activity of almost any kind. He would watch the daylight wax and wane on the ceiling, or roaches creep slowly up the wall. He had a Bible and tried to read, but he often found that he lacked the concentration to do so. He observed himself becoming neurotically possessive about his little space, at times putting his life in jeopardy by flying into a rage if a guard happened to step on his bed. He brooded incessantly, thinking back on all the mistakes he’d made in life, his regrets, his offenses against God and family.
One of the paradoxes of solitary confinement is that, as starved as people become for companionship, the experience typically leaves them unfit for social interaction. Once, Dellelo was allowed to have an in-person meeting with his lawyer, and he simply couldn’t handle it. After so many months in which his primary human contact had been an occasional phone call or brief conversations with an inmate down the tier, shouted through steel doors at the top of their lungs, he found himself unable to carry on a face-to-face conversation. He had trouble following both words and hand gestures and couldn’t generate them himself. When he realized this, he succumbed to a full-blown panic attack.
Many prisoners find survival in physical exercise, prayer, or plans for escape. Many carry out elaborate mental exercises, building entire houses in their heads, board by board, nail by nail, from the ground up, or memorizing team rosters for a baseball season. McCain recreated in his mind movies he’d seen. Anderson reconstructed complete novels from memory. Yuri Nosenko, a K.G.B. defector whom the C.I.A. wrongly accused of being a double agent and held for three years in total isolation (no reading material, no news, no human contact except with interrogators) in a closet-size concrete cell near Williamsburg, Virginia, made chess sets from threads and a calendar from lint (only to have them discovered and swept away).
Commissioners are not powerless. They could eliminate prolonged isolation with the stroke of a pen. So, I asked, why haven’t they? He told me what happened when he tried to move just one prisoner out of isolation. Legislators called for him to be fired and threatened to withhold basic funding. Corrections officers called members of the crime victim’s family and told them that he’d gone soft on crime. Hostile stories appeared in the tabloids. It is pointless for commissioners to act unilaterally, he said, without a change in public opinion.
This past year, both the Republican and the Democratic Presidential candidates came out firmly for banning torture and closing the facility in Guantánamo Bay, where hundreds of prisoners have been held in years-long isolation. Neither Barack Obama nor John McCain, however, addressed the question of whether prolonged solitary confinement is torture. For a Presidential candidate, no less than for the prison commissioner, this would have been political suicide. The simple truth is that public sentiment in America is the reason that solitary confinement has exploded in this country, even as other Western nations have taken steps to reduce it. This is the dark side of American exceptionalism. With little concern or demurral, we have consigned tens of thousands of our own citizens to conditions that horrified our highest court a century ago. Our willingness to discard these standards for American prisoners made it easy to discard the Geneva Conventions prohibiting similar treatment of foreign prisoners of war, to the detriment of America’s moral stature in the world. In much the same way that a previous generation of Americans countenanced legalized segregation, ours has countenanced legalized torture. And there is no clearer manifestation of this than our routine use of solitary confinement—on our own people, in our own communities, in a supermax prison, for example, that is a thirty-minute drive from my door.Read more at www.newyorker.comSee this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/ih8r
theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/wikileaks/dont-shoot-messenger-for-revealing-… [theaustralian.com.au]
This is a powerful piece of writing by Julian Assange for The Australian today. He places his document-publishing project in the context of his Australian background, an appeal to reason and examples from newspaper history.
bbc.co.uk/news/business-11938320 [bbc.co.uk]
Assange now appears to have displaced Osama Bin Laden as the gravest human threat to America. Well done, Julian. Millions are with you. The US can and will go its totalitarian way, with corps and officials round the world in lockstep, but w/o the will of the people - so for how long?
spiegel.de/international/world/0 [spiegel.de] ,1518,733154,00.html
I will defriend and block anyone who persists in slurring him for the wrong reasons. At least the conservatives are not delusional: his actions do mock their authority and they are right to feel threatened.
But the conspiracy wingnuts completely miss the point of what WikiLeaks does. They have made assumptions from a pattern of clues w/o establishing the whole path. Sometimes they are wildly wrong, but they are always confident.
Assange is deeply respected because he deals only in facts, and only with documents passed to WL, which are rigorously verified before release. He does not solicit and is motivated only by the value he places on transparency.
“Truthers” need to think about it and start reading more reliable sources. The pretext of these slurs against Assange regarding 9/11, eg, is ludicrous. The likes of Gordon Duff and Alex Jones over-reacted to a perfectly legitimate criticism of them by the very honest Assange.
By honest I also mean intellectually honest.
They could learn a lot from him and WikiLeaks about assessing information. Those who work and volunteer for WL look at hard evidence and only at material submitted to them. That is why WL has a credibility that screaming cult leaders and some niche writers can only envy.
I too have a multitude of questions about 9/11 but I don’t expect Assange to conjure the answers out of thin air.
wlcentral.org/node/540 [wlcentral.org]
This protest was organised before Assange was arrested today. It is in conjunction with Intn’l Human Rights Day, which coudn’t be more appropriate. Our PM and politicians, toadying for the US, have threatened Assange with confiscation of his passport should he try and return here and actively looking for ways to charge him with a crime.
know your cow butts
it used to be that one could select a good dairy cow based upon the shape of the hairs on its thighs. nowadays: growth hormones.
__